Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2016 20:53:50 GMT
pumpkin patch isn't a current thing and davepeta is a ducked up wildcard in any case. while davekat has some questionable points
anyway spoilers from the future, 6/4 update is an epic 15-minute flash of dave and karkat kissing. it's over now, everybody go home
the most alerting part for me is that seemingly majority of the fandom would totally dig that
|
|
|
Post by Gab on Apr 4, 2016 20:54:56 GMT
It just doesn't strike me as even worth getting excited about. If they're in a relationship, they barely act any differently than if they were "just" supertight bros. Whether they or anyone else is in a relationship or not barely means anything at all.
|
|
|
Post by karkat on Apr 4, 2016 20:57:35 GMT
also thanks Gab for quoting me saying that you aren't gonna get in this argument and then talking directly over me and getting in this argument. i said that despite all the other canon relationships in this comic, saying that dave/karkat never was a romantic thing after all this buildup feels really shitty to me. if they don't end up being _together_ at the end i wouldn't mind that at all. its not like im saying all gay relationships have to be _sucessful_, even though i'd like that to happen, im saying i'd like it to be _mentioned_ as a thing that is happening / did happen at one point.
|
|
|
Post by Blaperile on Apr 4, 2016 20:57:57 GMT
This is essentially how I feel about it... I don't think "queerbaiting" is quite the right term for a work that is chock full of canon queer relationships. As for the nature of Dave/Karkat's relationship, based on how people like Vriska talk about it (saying they're adorable "in whatever quadrant that whole situation settled in"), I personally suspect it's gonna be the kind of thing where they're NEVER confirmed as being firmly in any one quadrant, they're just kind of a vague red(ish) smudge. It would be the logical extension of Dave's whole monologue to John about how the lines of sexuality and relationships are blurrier than we give them credit for, it would be a fitting enough way for Karkat to develop past his previous state of always wanting to strictly define his and other peoples' relationships which leads to problems, and it would sort of be foreshadowed by Karkat's ancestor having a love that "went beyond the four quadrants, transcending the grid entirely". I mean, WOULDN'T a relationship that dips into all four quadrants kinda look like Dave and Karkat's? Two people who care about each other, support each other, help mediate their interactions with other people, act like best bros, get on each others' nerves at times, but who at the end of the day still care deeply about one another? I honestly never looked at it that way before writing this post, but once the relationship is viewed as an extension of Karkat's character development, it makes a lot more sense to me as a sudden plot point. Like Dave going from "constantly making gay jokes and trying to defend his masculinity" to "accepting that his ideas about masculinity were tied into his complex about heroism which relates back to his abuse from Bro", Karkat basically went from "obsessed with rigid relationship structures to a fault, even going so far as to make dating charts on multiple occasions" to "someone who spends so long around aliens that he gradually starts viewing relationships as less of a strictly-defined thing and is happier for it". It will probably end up tying in with the whole "Blood = interpersonal bonds" idea as well. I don't know how but somehow you always make me love Homestuck more than I already do. Like, uptil now I wasn't sure what to think of Dave and Karkat's potential romantic relationship and was ready to have it go either way, but the things you're saying here are kind of making me like it more.
|
|
cookiefonster
Dead

TAKE US THEIR FRESH JIMMY
Posts: 723
Pronouns: he/him/his
|
Post by cookiefonster on Apr 4, 2016 20:59:10 GMT
also thanks Gab for quoting me saying that you aren't gonna get in this argument and then talking directly over me and getting in this argument. i said that despite all the other canon relationships in this comic, saying that dave/karkat never was a romantic thing after all this buildup feels really shitty to me. if they don't end up being _together_ at the end i wouldn't mind that at all. its not like im saying all gay relationships have to be _sucessful_, even though i'd like that to happen, im saying i'd like it to be _mentioned_ as a thing that is happening / did happen at one point. I'm not myself arguing that Dave and Karkat never were in a relationship. Even though many people don't think it's true I still keep some stock in my headcanon that they kinda used to be in a relationship, which would satisfy those interested in the whole weird Dave sexuality arc (which surprisingly enough, I'm still not a fan of) because it lets us know he did try out a homosexual relationship.
|
|
cookiefonster
Dead

TAKE US THEIR FRESH JIMMY
Posts: 723
Pronouns: he/him/his
|
Post by cookiefonster on Apr 4, 2016 21:14:48 GMT
This is essentially how I feel about it... I don't think "queerbaiting" is quite the right term for a work that is chock full of canon queer relationships. As for the nature of Dave/Karkat's relationship, based on how people like Vriska talk about it (saying they're adorable "in whatever quadrant that whole situation settled in"), I personally suspect it's gonna be the kind of thing where they're NEVER confirmed as being firmly in any one quadrant, they're just kind of a vague red(ish) smudge. It would be the logical extension of Dave's whole monologue to John about how the lines of sexuality and relationships are blurrier than we give them credit for, it would be a fitting enough way for Karkat to develop past his previous state of always wanting to strictly define his and other peoples' relationships which leads to problems, and it would sort of be foreshadowed by Karkat's ancestor having a love that "went beyond the four quadrants, transcending the grid entirely". I mean, WOULDN'T a relationship that dips into all four quadrants kinda look like Dave and Karkat's? Two people who care about each other, support each other, help mediate their interactions with other people, act like best bros, get on each others' nerves at times, but who at the end of the day still care deeply about one another? I honestly never looked at it that way before writing this post, but once the relationship is viewed as an extension of Karkat's character development, it makes a lot more sense to me as a sudden plot point. Like Dave going from "constantly making gay jokes and trying to defend his masculinity" to "accepting that his ideas about masculinity were tied into his complex about heroism which relates back to his abuse from Bro", Karkat basically went from "obsessed with rigid relationship structures to a fault, even going so far as to make dating charts on multiple occasions" to "someone who spends so long around aliens that he gradually starts viewing relationships as less of a strictly-defined thing and is happier for it". It will probably end up tying in with the whole "Blood = interpersonal bonds" idea as well. I don't know how but somehow you always make me love Homestuck more than I already do. Like, uptil now I wasn't sure what to think of Dave and Karkat's potential romantic relationship and was ready to have it go either way, but the things you're saying here are kind of making me like it more. OH NO HE HAS JOINED THE DARK SIDEJust kidding if you like that ship then what do I care.
|
|
|
Post by karkat on Apr 4, 2016 21:18:08 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ConstantTroublemaker on Apr 4, 2016 21:18:29 GMT
Just kidding if you like that ship then what do I care. What do I even care at this point. Just make shit up to spite me. It's fine.
|
|
|
Post by karkat on Apr 4, 2016 21:32:22 GMT
cookiefonster you do know that saying IF YOU LIKE THIS GAY SHIP YOU ARE EVIL is a bit of a bad look considering, well, how certain people have been treated throughout history right? i get not liking the ship but plz cool it a little
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2016 21:33:56 GMT
I like relationships for the tragedy.
So which of them's gonna die?
|
|
cookiefonster
Dead

TAKE US THEIR FRESH JIMMY
Posts: 723
Pronouns: he/him/his
|
Post by cookiefonster on Apr 4, 2016 21:34:40 GMT
cookiefonster you do know that saying IF YOU LIKE THIS GAY SHIP YOU ARE EVIL is a bit of a bad look considering, well, how certain people have been treated throughout history right? i get not liking the ship but plz cool it a little Relax, I was just joking around.
|
|
|
Post by karkat on Apr 4, 2016 21:35:06 GMT
I like relationships for the tragedy. So which of them's gonna die? dave has that whole time shit going on but im gonna say me for the giggles
|
|
|
Post by karkat on Apr 4, 2016 21:37:17 GMT
edit: quote is not edit, damn it
for someone joking around you sure like to bring up your hatred of davekat at every opportunity. jokes can still hurt, you know. it doesn't absolve you of all guilt. anyway i cant find a way to tie this all back into homestuck so i'll not continue this train, but still understand how it can be mean.
|
|
cookiefonster
Dead

TAKE US THEIR FRESH JIMMY
Posts: 723
Pronouns: he/him/his
|
Post by cookiefonster on Apr 4, 2016 21:38:30 GMT
Can people please stop equating disliking a particular gay ship to disliking the concept of gay ships??
|
|
|
Post by mementovivere on Apr 4, 2016 21:47:09 GMT
Happy to be of service Mostly, I find that reading Homestuck is even more enjoyable when you look at it with a storyteller's eye. Fans tend to mostly care about relationships on the basis of which pairings are cutest, who their favorite characters are, which personalities mesh well, etc etc... but it seems to me that while those factors are important, Hussie generally has a plot-specific reason for pairing certain characters together, even if it doesn't become obvious until later (whether that means driving character development, creating conflict, symbolism, etc etc). People complained a lot about all the teen romance being a huge part of our introduction to the B2 kids, and while I can totally understand not liking that, in retrospect it seems pretty obvious that it wasn't just pandering to a fandom full of shippers--it was generating sources of conflict that would lead to Jane snapping, Dirk loathing certain parts of himself, Jake feeling hopeless, and so on. Most of their character arcs can be tied back to that, as well as the way Jane acted when she was being mind-controlled. The fact that the retcons resulted in an entirely new relationship right at the end of the story means that there's likely SOME important plot-related purpose behind it, it's just a matter of figuring out what it is--and specifically, the fact that the story is INTENTIONALLY avoiding placing them in any one quadrant strikes me as more significant than mere shipbait. Having the relationship be a culmination of Dave and Karkat's respective character arcs (and as a contrast to the dysfunctional Dave-Terezi-Karkat love triangle) seems as good a reason as any, and we already basically know that that's the case with Dave and his whole speech about his masculinity/heroism/Bro hangups, so why not Karkat and all of HIS story-long issues with all types of interpersonal relationships?
|
|
|
Post by Strawhat Luffy on Apr 4, 2016 21:49:49 GMT
If Hussie actually pulls off the "trancends all quadrants" thing with protagonists I'm taking my hat off to him.
|
|
|
Post by karkat on Apr 4, 2016 21:50:22 GMT
cookiefonster please note that i am not implying that. what i am saying is that your jokes can hurt people, regardless of your intention, and you should think about the stuff you say before you say it. its often good to take a step back and think about what you are saying before you make an angry post. anyway, im gonna leave for a bit to think about other things. i want this place to be nice for everyone to hang out in - and by nice i mean NICE - not that sort of fake nice where you are constantly annoyed by everyone but you can't state your true opinions, so you continue to be hassled around by people who don't understand why you might not like the things they say, so you stop showing up to the forums and have to find your own places to discuss shit. anyway homestuck is good and i like these updates and im looking for everything to go terribly wrong starting wednesday.
|
|
thecrystalship
Mr. Snoozyprince Mcsleepypants

sushi guro
Posts: 174
Pronouns: she/her/hers
|
Post by thecrystalship on Apr 4, 2016 21:51:10 GMT
Okay so this is how I feel. Not about Davekat, but about what is happening now, in the comic.
There is absolutely no way the Terezi we saw with Dave and Dirk can be the "same" Terezi as the one who Remem8ered. There is just no way. Think about exactly what happened. Terezi remembered EVERYTHING experienced by her Game Over self, and possibly all other selves, judging by Davepeta's dialogue. Which would not have even been written unless it pertained to Terezi. And then the next time we see her, she is completely fine, and doesn't even mention the content of her restored memories, or even that she remembered anything at all? When we KNOW that she must remember things that are extremely pertinent to the retcons and her original plan, such as the intended purpose of the wallet and the plush dragon. I don't think I really need to go into this more than I have to, but I genuinely think that Hussie is playing us here. We are going to pull out of a Mind synapse or something, and that will be the canon explanation (and perhaps even Hussie's original reasoning?) for the guest art. If not, then there will be SOME kind of twist regarding Terezi, but there's no way in hell that the one we saw in the most recent updates was the "same" one. Just listen to that final note in Terezi: Remem8er and you'll understand why that's impossible.
|
|
|
Post by ConstantTroublemaker on Apr 4, 2016 21:51:11 GMT
Can people please stop equating disliking a particular gay ship to disliking the concept of gay ships??
...or even to disliking gay people...
|
|
|
Post by Strawhat Luffy on Apr 4, 2016 21:53:34 GMT
Okay so this is how I feel. Not about Davekat, but about what is happening now, in the comic. There is absolutely no way the Terezi we saw with Dave and Dirk can be the "same" Terezi as the one who Remem8ered. There is just no way. Think about exactly what happened. Terezi remembered EVERYTHING experienced by her Game Over self, and possibly all other selves, judging by Davepeta's dialogue. Which would not have even been written unless it pertained to Terezi. And then the next time we see her, she is completely fine, and doesn't even mention the content of her restored memories, or even that she remembered anything at all? When we KNOW that she must remember things that are extremely pertinent to the retcons and her original plan, such as the intended purpose of the wallet and the plush dragon. I don't think I really need to go into this more than I have to, but I genuinely think that Hussie is playing us here. We are going to pull out of a Mind synapse or something, and that will be the canon explanation (and perhaps even Hussie's original reasoning?) for the guest art. If not, then there will be SOME kind of twist regarding Terezi, but there's no way in hell that the one we saw in the most recent updates was the "same" one. Just listen to that final note in Terezi: Remem8er and you'll understand why that's impossible. Question: how much time do you think passed between Remember and the post-omegapause updates with Terezi? Just because something wasn't shown in-comic doesn't mean it didn't happen. She remembered everything, had a reflection, maybe cried a little, maybe talked to the Striders about it, and next time we saw her she was fine.
|
|
|
Post by Blaperile on Apr 4, 2016 21:58:47 GMT
Happy to be of service Mostly, I find that reading Homestuck is even more enjoyable when you look at it with a storyteller's eye. Fans tend to mostly care about relationships on the basis of which pairings are cutest, who their favorite characters are, which personalities mesh well, etc etc... but it seems to me that while those factors are important, Hussie generally has a plot-specific reason for pairing certain characters together, even if it doesn't become obvious until later (whether that means driving character development, creating conflict, symbolism, etc etc). People complained a lot about all the teen romance being a huge part of our introduction to the B2 kids, and while I can totally understand not liking that, in retrospect it seems pretty obvious that it wasn't just pandering to a fandom full of shippers--it was generating sources of conflict that would lead to Jane snapping, Dirk loathing certain parts of himself, Jake feeling hopeless, and so on. The fact that the retcons resulted in an entirely new relationship right at the end of the story means that there's likely SOME important plot-related purpose behind it, it's just a matter of figuring out what it is--and specifically, the fact that the story is INTENTIONALLY avoiding placing them in any one quadrant strikes me as more significant than mere shipbait. Having the relationship be a culmination of Dave and Karkat's respective character arcs (and as a contrast to the dysfunctional Dave-Terezi-Karkat love triangle) seems as good a reason as any, and we already basically know that that's the case with Dave and his whole speech about his masculinity/heroism/Bro hangups, so why not Karkat and all of HIS story-long issues with all types of interpersonal relationships? Most of the time I do try to look from that same type of storytellers perspective as well, and I agree that it works really well. The thing is that I don't usually connect the dots as soon as some other people can, and thus I try to stay neutral on the subject until I learn more, be it through the story or by interaction with the fandom. The things you just said in your previous post are a prime example of the latter, where I was pretty neutral about Dave and Karkat's relationship until what you just said have made me start liking it more.  If something makes sense from the perspective of the story, then normally I like it too. The only real exception to this that I can remember is when Caliborn first appeared in a dialogue. His personality was so disgusting that I let my emotions go a little bit too far and I pretty much disliked Caliborn, but after a while he got developed more and I started looking at it from the story's perspective again and suddenly I started really liking him. 
|
|
|
Post by ConstantTroublemaker on Apr 4, 2016 21:58:51 GMT
cookiefonster please note that i am not implying that. what i am saying is that your jokes can hurt people, regardless of your intention, and you should think about the stuff you say before you say it. its often good to take a step back and think about what you are saying before you make an angry post. anyway, im gonna leave for a bit to think about other things. i want this place to be nice for everyone to hang out in - and by nice i mean NICE - not that sort of fake nice where you are constantly annoyed by everyone but you can't state your true opinions, so you continue to be hassled around by people who don't understand why you might not like the things they say, so you stop showing up to the forums and have to find your own places to discuss shit. anyway homestuck is good and i like these updates and im looking for everything to go terribly wrong starting wednesday.
Are you sure your name is Karkat and not Kankri?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2016 22:00:56 GMT
Oh for the love of.
|
|
|
Post by ConstantTroublemaker on Apr 4, 2016 22:01:54 GMT
There is absolutely no way the Terezi we saw with Dave and Dirk can be the "same" Terezi as the one who Remem8ered. There is just no way. Think about exactly what happened. Terezi remembered EVERYTHING experienced by her Game Over self, and possibly all other selves, judging by Davepeta's dialogue. Which would not have even been written unless it pertained to Terezi. And then the next time we see her, she is completely fine, and doesn't even mention the content of her restored memories, or even that she remembered anything at all? When we KNOW that she must remember things that are extremely pertinent to the retcons and her original plan, such as the intended purpose of the wallet and the plush dragon. I don't think I really need to go into this more than I have to, but I genuinely think that Hussie is playing us here. We are going to pull out of a Mind synapse or something, and that will be the canon explanation (and perhaps even Hussie's original reasoning?) for the guest art. If not, then there will be SOME kind of twist regarding Terezi, but there's no way in hell that the one we saw in the most recent updates was the "same" one. Just listen to that final note in Terezi: Remem8er and you'll understand why that's impossible.
Yeah, the complete lack of any reference to [S] Terezi: Remem8er is another of those incongruences which, AH being AH, very likely mean something really weird is going on...
|
|
|
Post by Blaperile on Apr 4, 2016 22:11:13 GMT
Guys, calm down okay? I see the moods are getting pretty lit up here.
Discussing why you do or do not like Davekat is fine, but please continue to respect each other's opinion so that we can all continue to have a fun and civilized discussion here.
|
|