|
Post by alleywaycreeper on Apr 16, 2016 20:13:46 GMT
I firmly believed this to be The Point, up til the moment Act 7 ended and the retcon was revealed as The Only Way Out, Exactly The Way It Went. Now I'm so confused. The style and theme of HS was utterly reversed in its final moments. Readers like me are punished, like LE, for being "stuck in the story." Which, as I said... Just tastes like poison. Please, someone, tell me I'm wrong. You said it yourself: bait-and-switch narrative mindfucks Let's wait and see what the epilogue has in store. I can't shake the vibe that Act 7 was a setup. The whole thing was setup after setup for events we didn't see. If the epilogue doesn't have anything to do with those events, only then shall I allow myself to grieve for what could've been, but a false ending feels like just the kind of dick move Hussie would pull to make the actual ending look that much better.
|
|
imglasses
Your shit is wrecked
Meet the Meme Team
Posts: 633
Pronouns: they/them/theirs
|
Post by imglasses on Apr 16, 2016 23:04:28 GMT
The pre-retcon timeline still had a new battlefield in Skaia, it had a genesis tadpole in the volcano, and Earth had already been retrieved in time. The Condesce was still alive in the pre-retcon timeline, and she's not the kind of person to give up after millions of years of planning. She had the Ring of Life, and she could have used it to revive Jane, who could have revived everyone else the Condesce needed. Then she could have finished the session herself. I don't think it's impossible for the pre-scratch session to have been completed What about the planets wrecked in the fight between Condy and Aranea? I think four wrecked Lands are more than enough to stop the Ultimate Alchemy from happening, even if all players got somehow revived. No, that's exactly my point; there is no need for the pre-retcon timeline to lead to the creation of the new universe, if the retcon was already planned by Paradox Space all along; just like there is no need for a pre-scratch session to be won (and it must indeed not be won) when a scratch is scheduled to take place. The Condesce probably could have just killed the denizens and taken their grist to Skaia herself. It just seems like there has to be pre-retcon cherubs. The cherubs talked with the pre-retcon kids and the post-retcon kids, and sometimes those conversations were different. We know Caliborn had a conversation with Jake both pre-retcon and post-retcon where he gave him the code to his sucker juju. Pre-retcon, Caliborn mentioned Erisolsprite in this conversation. Post-retcon, there was no Erisolsprite. Therefore, two different conversations happened pre-retcon and post-retcon, and it wouldn't make sense for the same Caliborn to have had both of them. I'm not saying the retcons weren't planned by Paradox Space, but that doesn't mean the session couldn't have been won twice. Retcons aren't the same thing as scratches, even if they're similar. You don't have to be in a failed session in order to do them.
|
|
|
Post by butternutpumpkin on Apr 17, 2016 1:01:33 GMT
Strictly speaking, no. There's nothing to suggest that the humans couldn't have just used more mundane means to get to Caliborn's Session to pick a fight with him. This page www.mspaintadventures.com/ACT6ACT6.php?s=6&p=009318 seems to say it was in fact retcon power. Though, technically speaking, regular ol' time travel seems like it could have achieved the same thing, and I'm not even sure how canon the Masterpiece is at this point. This is another thing that really bothered me about the retcon arc. It says some pretty unhealthy things about Terezi's character and mindset that she honestly thought that isolating herself from the people who cared about her and glomming on to someone who she KNOWS is dangerous and toxic out of guilt and misplaced childhood nostalgia (?) was the best course of action. And we see the outcome of this when we get back to the session and she's completely insecure and tangled in an incredibly one-sided dependent relationship with Vriska, to the apparent exclusion of all else. We see first hand that magicking away one's issues does not work. It seems like Hussie actually TOOK PAINS to set up an interesting conflict where Terezi learns that clinging to her past, and attaching herself to someone who refuses to grow up, is an unhealthy thing, and that, painful as it is, she needs to let go of past guilt and trust her own agency. And then the other shoe never drops. There is no resolution for her. Her issues are buried for the sake of the plot, and we never hear of them again. And I'm left sitting here wondering where the hell the confident, self-motivated troll we met in Act 4 went. ...well that kind of got away from retcons, didn't it. But I guess that's my point; it wasn't an inherently terrible idea. It actually could have been an interesting and fulfilling one that taught the characters some good lessons. But he utterly failed to deliver the payoff for the setup. EDIT: Heck, we even had Terezi: Remem8er, a flash entirely composed of Vriska and Terezi being cute as kids. How cathartically painful, for Terezi and for us, would it be for her to reject Vriska after that, letting go of the past for the harsh reality of what Vriska's become? How many different 'growing up" themes would that fulfill? There's so much potential ALREADY THERE if he'd just delivered on it. It feels silly and presumptuous to make a wishlist of what should have happened, but I cannot fathom why he'd put this setup in place and then not do anything with it, unless he just ran out of time or energy or patience. I agree completely. I never really got into their relationship mainly because we never even saw them on friendly terms, so it just seems toxic to me, especially since Vriska post-retcon ended up being worse. That's actually something I don't get; Terezi in Act 5 didn't like the way Vriska was acting. But somehow she's okay with it now, and it seems like she's only okay with it out of guilt that she could of killed her. I just think it's annoying how she'd rather cling onto someone who's not even on good terms with her rather than getting over it and being with people who truly care about her. She wasn't like this in the early acts. It's like as if she's in denial that the friend she once had is gone, which is understandable, but the actions she chose to deal with that is terrible. I was honestly expecting the retcon to be some sort of psyche, like it was all happening through Terezi's mind abilities, and pre-retcon Terezi realizing that not killing Vriska wouldn't have made things better for her or Vriska anyway, hence telling John to just get the ring. And I just realized something that I actually find rather hilarious. After Davekat happened and everyone jumped ship, people argued that Karezi was a bad relationship because Karkat didn't treat her well by wanting her in every quadrant, but they're apparently completely okay with Terezi being with Vriska, red even, despite it being very one-sided and rather toxic. Vriska isn't even helping or noticing Terezi's guilt, and Terezi isn't getting close with anyone else and seems to bow down to everything Vriska says. And it's gone so bad that she may have actually not gone to the future universe because of Vriska not being there or something. Like seriously Karkat is nowhere near as abusive as Vriska is, and unlike Vriska, he actually realized what he was doing was wrong and made up to it in Openbound. And even in Hivebent Terezi never clung on to Karkat so much that it was unhealthy, unlike what she's doing with Vriska. I'm just not understanding their thinking, that apparently Vrisrezi is completely okay despite it being quite toxic. It just seems like they're letting this abusiveness pass because Vrisrezi is not a hetero relationship, which is one thing that has really been bugging me with the way the fandom has become. I honestly don't mind the two being moirails. But only when it's not one-sided and they actually commit to other people/trolls rather than gluing to each other. At the moment this is probably the only positive side of post-retcon Vriska that I can find; that she's not clinging onto Terezi and talks to other people/trolls.
|
|
|
Post by melonlord on Apr 17, 2016 3:56:44 GMT
I agree completely. I never really got into their relationship mainly because we never even saw them on friendly terms, so it just seems toxic to me, especially since Vriska post-retcon ended up being worse. That's actually something I don't get; Terezi in Act 5 didn't like the way Vriska was acting. But somehow she's okay with it now, and it seems like she's only okay with it out of guilt that she could of killed her. I just think it's annoying how she'd rather cling onto someone who's not even on good terms with her rather than getting over it and being with people who truly care about her. She wasn't like this in the early acts. It's like as if she's in denial that the friend she once had is gone, which is understandable, but the actions she chose to deal with that is terrible. I was honestly expecting the retcon to be some sort of psyche, like it was all happening through Terezi's mind abilities, and pre-retcon Terezi realizing that not killing Vriska wouldn't have made things better for her or Vriska anyway, hence telling John to just get the ring. Yeahhh...retjohn!Vriska's relationship with Terezi is quite emphatically Not Okay. Really, most things about retjohn!Vriska are very, very obviously Not Okay. I was practically certain that she was going to be a huge lesson on not cheating away your problems, not clinging to your past, staying away from toxic relationships, and that the ends do not always justify the means. But now we've gotten to the end, her plan went off without a hitch, she got to be the Big Damn Hero like she childishly wanted to be, and I have no idea what to think. Hussie very, very deliberately piled up heaps upon heaps of karma just waiting to crash down on her, and then just never released it. Did he run out of time or energy? Was he trying to send some kind of message? Because if the author honestly thought retjohn!Vriska was deserving of a heroic finish, then a sociopath quite clearly killed Hussie and took over the comic sometime during the omegapause. (Wondering if this is all an elaborate setup to reveal that Lord English is in control seems like wishful thinking at this point) Anyway, back on topic, I can see why Terezi, guilty and emotionally wrecked by Gamzee, would think that saving Vriska was the solution to her problems. It's a logical enough error to make; things started going wrong for me after I did X, so removing X will fix everything. What I don't get is why the comic doesn't acknowledge this obvious mistake as a mistake, or make Terezi face her actual problems. I can maybe understand why people wouldn't feel comfortable shipping Terezi and Karkat (that "sharing chart" was just creepily possessive), but I don't understand why, from a character perspective, she would cut off all relations with Karkat post-retcon. They don't have to date, but I don't think they share a single conversation post-retcon, except a brief exchange during Vriska's tactical meeting. Weren't they friends for years before any of this even happens? What even happens post-retcon that would logically separate them, besides a single, cryptic message? Not much else I can say on anything else except that I agree completely. Vrisrezi is just an utterly lopsided and unhealthy relationship. Can't really comment on the fandom, I don't keep up with shipping too much. I love non-hetero relationships and think we need more of them, but I dislike toxic relationships even more. I'd just like to posit this, which hopefully won't create a shitstorm: I think if Vriska were male rather than female, we'd be seeing a LOT fewer people shipping Vrisrezi, and a lot more people calling out the ones who do.
|
|
|
Post by butternutpumpkin on Apr 17, 2016 8:18:24 GMT
I agree completely. I never really got into their relationship mainly because we never even saw them on friendly terms, so it just seems toxic to me, especially since Vriska post-retcon ended up being worse. That's actually something I don't get; Terezi in Act 5 didn't like the way Vriska was acting. But somehow she's okay with it now, and it seems like she's only okay with it out of guilt that she could of killed her. I just think it's annoying how she'd rather cling onto someone who's not even on good terms with her rather than getting over it and being with people who truly care about her. She wasn't like this in the early acts. It's like as if she's in denial that the friend she once had is gone, which is understandable, but the actions she chose to deal with that is terrible. I was honestly expecting the retcon to be some sort of psyche, like it was all happening through Terezi's mind abilities, and pre-retcon Terezi realizing that not killing Vriska wouldn't have made things better for her or Vriska anyway, hence telling John to just get the ring. Yeahhh...retjohn!Vriska's relationship with Terezi is quite emphatically Not Okay. Really, most things about retjohn!Vriska are very, very obviously Not Okay. I was practically certain that she was going to be a huge lesson on not cheating away your problems, not clinging to your past, staying away from toxic relationships, and that the ends do not always justify the means. But now we've gotten to the end, her plan went off without a hitch, she got to be the Big Damn Hero like she childishly wanted to be, and I have no idea what to think. Hussie very, very deliberately piled up heaps upon heaps of karma just waiting to crash down on her, and then just never released it. Did he run out of time or energy? Was he trying to send some kind of message? Because if the author honestly thought retjohn!Vriska was deserving of a heroic finish, then a sociopath quite clearly killed Hussie and took over the comic sometime during the omegapause. (Wondering if this is all an elaborate setup to reveal that Lord English is in control seems like wishful thinking at this point) Anyway, back on topic, I can see why Terezi, guilty and emotionally wrecked by Gamzee, would think that saving Vriska was the solution to her problems. It's a logical enough error to make; things started going wrong for me after I did X, so removing X will fix everything. What I don't get is why the comic doesn't acknowledge this obvious mistake as a mistake, or make Terezi face her actual problems. I can maybe understand why people wouldn't feel comfortable shipping Terezi and Karkat (that "sharing chart" was just creepily possessive), but I don't understand why, from a character perspective, she would cut off all relations with Karkat post-retcon. They don't have to date, but I don't think they share a single conversation post-retcon, except a brief exchange during Vriska's tactical meeting. Weren't they friends for years before any of this even happens? What even happens post-retcon that would logically separate them, besides a single, cryptic message? Not much else I can say on anything else except that I agree completely. Vrisrezi is just an utterly lopsided and unhealthy relationship. Can't really comment on the fandom, I don't keep up with shipping too much. I love non-hetero relationships and think we need more of them, but I dislike toxic relationships even more. I'd just like to posit this, which hopefully won't create a shitstorm: I think if Vriska were male rather than female, we'd be seeing a LOT fewer people shipping Vrisrezi, and a lot more people calling out the ones who do. Yeah I do respect that people don't like the pairing, and their reasons are reasonable and I do respect there opinion. Pre-retcon Karkat had a lot of character development after that though which is why it's still my otp. I just don't get why the same people are okay with Vrisrezi though. And the fact that Karkat and Terezi never talked post-retcon has been something that I really disliked about the retcon in general. It literally threw a close relationship that has been there since Act 4 out the window, and it got resolved in the worst way possible. No, don't write a stupid text on the wall; talk it out yourselves. I agree there, I think there should be more non-hetero relationships too since they're hard to find. Although at the same time I dislike the way the fandom is going about this and it's why I've dropped out of the homestuck fandom over at tumblr in general. I was actually thinking about that not that long ago so I honestly think it's a good thing you've brought that up. If Vriska was male I bet she would have a lot more hate in general, especially the abuse to Tavros. I find it surprising that a lot of people (it's mostly people over at tumblr, which is even more surprising) want post-retcon Vriska to have a happy ending, considering this is a character who bullied Jake and literally fat shamed someone. And the fact that after Act 5 the comic treats male characters who do bad things terribly and make all characters hate them (see Gamzee, Caliborn and Eridan), but gives Vriska a pretty good time is something that has bothered me because it's like as if the comic is saying that woman can be as abusive as they want. if vriska was male the only difference that would make to me would be that he would be on my husbando list
|
|
|
Post by alleywaycreeper on Apr 17, 2016 11:57:29 GMT
I was actually thinking about that not that long ago so I honestly think it's a good thing you've brought that up. If Vriska was male I bet she would have a lot more hate in general, especially the abuse to Tavros. I find it surprising that a lot of people (it's mostly people over at tumblr, which is even more surprising) want post-retcon Vriska to have a happy ending, considering this is a character who bullied Jake and literally fat shamed someone. And the fact that after Act 5 the comic treats male characters who do bad things terribly and make all characters hate them (see Gamzee, Caliborn and Eridan), but gives Vriska a pretty good time is something that has bothered me because it's like as if the comic is saying that woman can be as abusive as they want. Yes. This has always bugged me, because it always sort of struck me as....like, women could never do as much damage as men? Like, the reason what Eridan does is so gross is it comes from and is used in a society where men have physical and societal advantages over women that they exploit to control them. But Eridan's relationship with Feferi is kind of an inversion of that. She's shown to be incredibly strong, possibly stronger than him (we never see him dragging a whale in a net with his bare hands) and she's higher up on the stratum than him. She has all the advantages, so his treatment of her, while gross, doesn't help him like it would have if they were human. While Vriska and Tavros...given their differences in blood color....sometimes I can't help but think of it as a story of a mistress beating the shit out of her slave and then trying to get it on with him. Which is squicky as hell. Vriska has all the advantages and she uses them to horrifying effect. She poses much more danger to Tavros than Eridan does to Feferi (at least initially and societally) but his actions are treated as worse and are punished accordingly. And this strikes me as kind of sexist. Like, no matter how much damage a woman does you can't take it or her as seriously as a man who does just as much damage. Also, can I just say I LOVE that we're talking about how unhealthy Vrisrezi is? It seemed that when it would be brought up previously there were more people who didn't see the problem than people who were bothered by it. It was kind of frustrating that so few people appeared to see how bad it was for both of them.
|
|
|
Post by Neptz on Apr 17, 2016 12:12:09 GMT
if vriska was male the only difference that would make to me would be that he would be on my husbando listtalk about masochistic, buddy.
|
|
|
Post by butternutpumpkin on Apr 18, 2016 0:55:36 GMT
if vriska was male the only difference that would make to me would be that he would be on my husbando listtalk about masochistic, buddy. well izaya orihara is my favourite fictional character so i have accepted that the character that i like are always fucked up a long time ago. dave and karkat used to be on there though before i out-aged them
in all seriousness though i only like that type of character if they're complex. i understand that you hate vriska, but please accept that i have my own opinion and that she used to be my favourite character along with karkat before act 6 broke her arc, and still is if i ignore act 6. and please note that fiction doesn't equal reality. i know that i would hate vriska a lot if she was a real life person. but because she's a fictional character things are different.
|
|
|
Post by butternutpumpkin on Apr 18, 2016 1:00:20 GMT
I was actually thinking about that not that long ago so I honestly think it's a good thing you've brought that up. If Vriska was male I bet she would have a lot more hate in general, especially the abuse to Tavros. I find it surprising that a lot of people (it's mostly people over at tumblr, which is even more surprising) want post-retcon Vriska to have a happy ending, considering this is a character who bullied Jake and literally fat shamed someone. And the fact that after Act 5 the comic treats male characters who do bad things terribly and make all characters hate them (see Gamzee, Caliborn and Eridan), but gives Vriska a pretty good time is something that has bothered me because it's like as if the comic is saying that woman can be as abusive as they want. Yes. This has always bugged me, because it always sort of struck me as....like, women could never do as much damage as men? Like, the reason what Eridan does is so gross is it comes from and is used in a society where men have physical and societal advantages over women that they exploit to control them. But Eridan's relationship with Feferi is kind of an inversion of that. She's shown to be incredibly strong, possibly stronger than him (we never see him dragging a whale in a net with his bare hands) and she's higher up on the stratum than him. She has all the advantages, so his treatment of her, while gross, doesn't help him like it would have if they were human. While Vriska and Tavros...given their differences in blood color....sometimes I can't help but think of it as a story of a mistress beating the shit out of her slave and then trying to get it on with him. Which is squicky as hell. Vriska has all the advantages and she uses them to horrifying effect. She poses much more danger to Tavros than Eridan does to Feferi (at least initially and societally) but his actions are treated as worse and are punished accordingly. And this strikes me as kind of sexist. Like, no matter how much damage a woman does you can't take it or her as seriously as a man who does just as much damage. Also, can I just say I LOVE that we're talking about how unhealthy Vrisrezi is? It seemed that when it would be brought up previously there were more people who didn't see the problem than people who were bothered by it. It was kind of frustrating that so few people appeared to see how bad it was for both of them. I agree with everything you said there. It's sexist to bother genders and no abuser should get away with what they're doing. The funny thing is, Vriska's abuse on Tavros literally hits home to me because I was a huge bullying target at school, and I was in a weird situation were the abuser bullied me on some days, but behaved like they were my friend on other days and I still don't know what the heck was going on there. But I was too shy to overcome it. That's another reason why I'm angry that Tavros's abuse was never taken seriously by anyone and Tavros never really proved himself properly. I actually hated Vriska when I first read through act 5, but then I started finding her motives and her character in general interesting, and when she confessed to John I couldn't hate her anymore. That's probably why I don't like act 6 Vriska and especially post-retcon Vriska. But going back on topic, I wouldn't have minded the retcon if it handled itself better and just did what it was meant to do. I don't think Terezi should have used it to fix her problems, and I still don't agree with the timeline needing Vriska to stay stable (because that seems like protagonist material there). Also, if the retcon had occurred a lot earlier in the comic and didn't give us three years to warm up to the pre-retcon characters, that would have been nice too. And another thing I don't like is that a lot of extras are based off the pre-retcon timeline. Like for instance all the pre-retcon meteor crew stories on Paradox Space and how the kickstarter's artwork is of the pre-retcon characters. Sorry guys I don't know how to multi quote on these forums.
|
|
|
Post by obsidalicious on Apr 18, 2016 5:56:30 GMT
Sorry guys I don't know how to multi quote on these forums. I think you just gotta quote the first one, ctrl-X the lot, go back the thread, quote the second one, and paste in the first. Anyway Retcon stuff: I think another thing that bothers me about the Retcon is the fact that it's not. It's presented in the story as some sort of total Timeline overwriter that's far reaching and complete enough to be a retcon from the reader's perspective in many situations, but it's obviously not a full retcon as the F.R. is unaffected. Now I know that we, the audience, were the ones who called it a retcon, and that there's good reason for the F.R. to go unaffected, but I do feel that, if there was a way to make it work, an actual, proper retcon would be ideal for Homestuck. Not in the actual literal sense of overwriting pages and thus screwing with archival readers, but with all the meta and 4th wall breaking Homestuck does, a device that transcends the story's internal mechanics and affects it on an external level is right up Homestuck's alley. But instead what we got out of this incredibly meta story is a device, touted as some sort of extreme reality/narrative breaker, that ended up just being a slight spin on the already existing and mundane Time Travel and Scratch phenomena.
|
|
|
Post by butternutpumpkin on Apr 18, 2016 8:14:12 GMT
^ Exactly. It's a week retcon; not a true one. It was a retcon that solved everyone's teen drama and undoing one of the most emotional moments in Homestuck (to me anyway), both which should have stayed. Homestuck has a huge theme about growing up, and doesn't growing up involve overcoming problems you face on the way? And thank you! The fact that I didn't know how to multi quote was really bothering me.
|
|
|
Post by Neptz on Apr 19, 2016 20:36:27 GMT
talk about masochistic, buddy. well izaya orihara is my favourite fictional character so i have accepted that the character that i like are always fucked up a long time ago. dave and karkat used to be on there though before i out-aged them
in all seriousness though i only like that type of character if they're complex. i understand that you hate vriska, but please accept that i have my own opinion and that she used to be my favourite character along with karkat before act 6 broke her arc, and still is if i ignore act 6. and please note that fiction doesn't equal reality. i know that i would hate vriska a lot if she was a real life person. but because she's a fictional character things are different. you seem oddly defensive for some reason at like 4 words chill a bit. i meant it in a joking manner. i'll hate a character irregardless if they're complex. being serious here, i don't care how much vriska was forced to kill trolls becauuse of her lusus and her griefy bit before her death to john enraged me even more. it was practically "oh my god i was such a a-hole forgive me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" to me, even though that wasn't it in a technical sense. i like complex characters, but not when they're hitler incarnate. i liked her bit of character development when she died and was pretty mad when she got separated from meenah. one of the reasons i hate the retcon was because it brought back that awful vriska when i never expected her to come back again.
|
|
|
Post by butternutpumpkin on Apr 20, 2016 3:58:39 GMT
well izaya orihara is my favourite fictional character so i have accepted that the character that i like are always fucked up a long time ago. dave and karkat used to be on there though before i out-aged them
in all seriousness though i only like that type of character if they're complex. i understand that you hate vriska, but please accept that i have my own opinion and that she used to be my favourite character along with karkat before act 6 broke her arc, and still is if i ignore act 6. and please note that fiction doesn't equal reality. i know that i would hate vriska a lot if she was a real life person. but because she's a fictional character things are different. you seem oddly defensive for some reason at like 4 words chill a bit. i meant it in a joking manner. i'll hate a character irregardless if they're complex. being serious here, i don't care how much vriska was forced to kill trolls becauuse of her lusus and her griefy bit before her death to john enraged me even more. it was practically "oh my god i was such a a-hole forgive me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" to me, even though that wasn't it in a technical sense. i like complex characters, but not when they're hitler incarnate. i liked her bit of character development when she died and was pretty mad when she got separated from meenah. one of the reasons i hate the retcon was because it brought back that awful vriska when i never expected her to come back again. Oh sorry, I thought you were being serious and that's why I got defensive. If you didn't mean it in that way then that's fine. I don't really know the people on this forums that well so I have no idea when they're joking. xD
|
|
thecrystalship
Mr. Snoozyprince Mcsleepypants
sushi guro
Posts: 174
Pronouns: she/her/hers
|
Post by thecrystalship on Apr 20, 2016 4:05:52 GMT
The way post-retcon Vriska was written is one of the few things that give me hope for a bait-and-switch. There's almost no way the ending in which she succeeds can be the "real ending" of Homestuck.
EDIT: I actually wouldn't mind if Terezi ended up with a better version of Vriska though. Like if Griska didn't actually double-die, and was brought back to life with the ring, or if they find a way to restore Vriska's memories so that she's not a bad guy anymore. That might actually be a fitting "punishment", to have her personality "diluted" by that of a "loser" (from her perspective). And if she just broke down and starting crying and apologizing afterwards, it might actually be a powerful scene.
(S) Vriska: R3M3MB3R?
|
|
|
Post by alleywaycreeper on Apr 20, 2016 5:07:38 GMT
The way post-retcon Vriska was written is one of the few things that give me hope for a bait-and-switch. There's almost no way the ending in which she succeeds can be the "real ending" of Homestuck. EDIT: I actually wouldn't mind if Terezi ended up with a better version of Vriska though. Like if Griska didn't actually double-die, and was brought back to life with the ring, or if they find a way to restore Vriska's memories so that she's not a bad guy anymore. That might actually be a fitting "punishment", to have her personality "diluted" by that of a "loser" (from her perspective). And if she just broke down and starting crying and apologizing afterwards, it might actually be a powerful scene. (S) Vriska: R3M3MB3R? I'm positive we're getting a 'real' ending. My only fear is it'll take another seven years.
|
|
thecrystalship
Mr. Snoozyprince Mcsleepypants
sushi guro
Posts: 174
Pronouns: she/her/hers
|
Post by thecrystalship on Apr 20, 2016 5:25:39 GMT
I'm positive we're getting a 'real' ending. My only fear is it'll take another seven years. This is definitely the hardest pause by far. Hopefully it'll be worth it, though. When you think about it, the "ending" only took up 17 days of story time, which makes it exactly as long as the Trickster arc, and not very long at all when you look at the span of Homestuck as a whole. So I might not actually be too disappointed with it, after all is said and done. Anyway, if a Flash like that does happen, it has to use this song: "Without you, there'd be no sun in my sky, there'd be no love in my life, there'd be no world left for me..."
|
|
|
Post by alleywaycreeper on Apr 20, 2016 5:35:27 GMT
I'm positive we're getting a 'real' ending. My only fear is it'll take another seven years. This is definitely the hardest pause by far. Hopefully it'll be worth it, though. When you think about it, the "ending" only took up 17 days of story time, which makes it exactly as long as the Trickster arc, and not very long at all when you look at the span of Homestuck as a whole. So I might not actually be too disappointed with it, after all is said and done. I honestly think after Collide and Act 7 Hussie doesn't have to do anything that's anywhere near as crazy again, (which might even have been the purpose of those two flashes) so that gives me hope that maybe we won't have to wait as long for the next update as we did after Remem8er. Can't tell if that's just wishful thinking or not, though.
|
|
thecrystalship
Mr. Snoozyprince Mcsleepypants
sushi guro
Posts: 174
Pronouns: she/her/hers
|
Post by thecrystalship on Apr 20, 2016 6:10:11 GMT
I honestly think after Collide and Act 7 Hussie doesn't have to do anything that's anywhere near as crazy again, (which might even have been the purpose of those two flashes) so that gives me hope that maybe we won't have to wait as long for the next update as we did after Remem8er. Can't tell if that's just wishful thinking or not, though. I'm not even sure why he did it. I can kind of see what he might be going for, but it doesn't even properly communicate the flaws of retconning away your problems, A6A6I5 pre-Omegapause did a better job of that. And usually he would just skip over stuff like this with regular panels, like the Black King fight and Heroes of Light: Strife. All we needed was Remem8er!Terezi narrating the panels and telling us that Vriska's plan succeeded, but there was a spiritual cost, etcetera. We really didn't need 27 minutes of Flash for this. Which makes me scared that this was actually the real ending, but... Hussie didn't even draw any of it? LOL. Maybe this was like a swan song for fan content? And he wanted to appease the people who actually wanted ONE fight scene, Fraymotifs, the Vast Croak, a happy ending, blah blah blah. I don't know man.
|
|
|
Post by alleywaycreeper on Apr 20, 2016 7:38:22 GMT
I honestly think after Collide and Act 7 Hussie doesn't have to do anything that's anywhere near as crazy again, (which might even have been the purpose of those two flashes) so that gives me hope that maybe we won't have to wait as long for the next update as we did after Remem8er. Can't tell if that's just wishful thinking or not, though. Maybe this was like a swan song for fan content? And he wanted to appease the people who actually wanted ONE fight scene, Fraymotifs, the Vast Croak, a happy ending, blah blah blah. I don't know man. This was part of my take. There are a couple of reasons why I think he did things this way. - One: the 'real' ending is going to be far more low key than the flashes we've seen even if it's completely narratively satisfying, so these last bits were for fans who like the flashy stuff, so that even if they don't like the 'real' ending they come away happy.
- Two: something bad has to happen before the triumph, (the more I think about that 'the kids are actually Jade's final frog' theory the more I fall in love with it) and all of this happy, easy stuff is to make it seem that much nastier when it hits, and that much more awesome when it's overcome. (It's certainly going to knock everyone who isn't at all suspicious of the ending we got on their asses.) It'll be an illustration of his Mario star speech from earlier in the comic. This is what happens when you rely on stars, kids: BOOM! Splat.
- Three: like it or not, an 'ending' that's actually a troll that leads to a 'real' ending is far more memorable than just a straight up honest ending and Hussie always has to top himself.
- Four: the comic is ridiculously meta, so it makes sense that if the kids triumphing over the narrative leads to an ending where they escape it, 'Homestuck' should end before they do so.
- Five: the author wanted to enlist some talented fans to contribute something cool to the end of the comic.
- Six: Hussie can't help it, he has to drag things out. It's almost his trademark. He does that shit when he doesn't have to, sometimes because he doesn't have to. He's a bit nuts like that, and it's part of the reason Homestuck's taken so long to end. (See also: adding twelve new characters, adding twelve more new characters, and basically the entirety of Act 6.)
I think Hussie is shooting for an ending that breaks our brains more than possibly even Cascade ever dreamed of doing, and look at us! Look at the first couple of posts in the Act 7 reaction thread! He's already halfway there. I think he wants everyone to fall under a false sense of security (and disillusionment) before dropping the hammer. What we're feeling now is part of it. (And he won't be able to drink the same tears of archival readers so he might as well get as much out of us while he can.) For anybody else I wouldn't think this, but Hussie knows how to do this and has done it before. Everything that felt wrong about Collide and Act 7 just felt too... deliberate for him not to be pulling something on us now.
|
|
thecrystalship
Mr. Snoozyprince Mcsleepypants
sushi guro
Posts: 174
Pronouns: she/her/hers
|
Post by thecrystalship on Apr 20, 2016 8:01:01 GMT
For anybody else I wouldn't think this, but Hussie knows how to do this and has done it before. Everything that felt wrong about Collide and Act 7 just felt too... deliberate for him not to be pulling something on us now. Hahaha what do you meeean it was totally normal. *ends Collide in the most bizarrely ominous way imaginable* *takes an hour to append his newspost with the information that was most pertinent to us, when there's no way he forgot* *refers to the ending as "THIS ending" instead of "THE ending", multiple times* Haha oh wait.
|
|
|
Post by therationaldove on Apr 20, 2016 17:50:12 GMT
I don't know...like I said, I feel like this is the ending that Hussie intended. I have really high doubts that this is just some sort of psyche moment or anything like that. All that work for something that wasn't meant to have any substance or meaning? Okay, so you could argue that he did that was the Beforus trolls, but still this is end of the comic. I doubt that Hussie would be messing around with something like that, even if he has done it in the past.
However, I feel like we should be focused on the retcon itself, not necessarily Act 7.
|
|
|
Post by alleywaycreeper on Apr 20, 2016 20:03:16 GMT
I don't know...like I said, I feel like this is the ending that Hussie intended. I have really high doubts that this is just some sort of psyche moment or anything like that. I doubt that Hussie would be messing around with something like that, even if he has done it in the past. However, I feel like we should be focused on the retcon itself, not necessarily Act 7. Well, the retcon leads directly to Act 7, and is sort of the reason it is what it is. If the lead up to the final Act had been better and the retcon had been used more effectively, no one would have the problems with Act 7 they do, or at the very least they'd have less problems. So the two are kind of intertwined. All that work for something that wasn't meant to have any substance or meaning? Okay, so you could argue that he did that was the Beforus trolls, but still this is end of the comic. Well, the argument is that this isn't the end of the comic, but it wouldn't be without meaning. If it was meant to make everybody sure that it was the real ending so that they would be gut punched when it wasn't, then it'd serve a very important purpose. And if that soul merger thing ever happens, all this stuff would still be important even if it all goes to hell and everyone dies, because it will be a lesson our characters can learn from even if they were not originally the version of themselves that this stuff happened to. Besides which, would you rather this ending wasn't a fake out (and thereby had one kind of substance and meaning behind it as opposed to another) or would you rather things like the masterpiece be 'all that work for something that wasn't meant to have any substance or meaning?' instead? Because if this ending is legit, it delegitimizes a lot of loose threads that Hussie never tied up. It makes a lot of things pointless.
|
|
|
Post by therationaldove on Apr 21, 2016 0:25:19 GMT
I don't know. I mean, I kinda ambivalent about the ending in general. Like, I can accept this ending as the true ending with the epilouge only really serving as a way to let us know what happened to the kids after they went through the door. I guess, I just don't think Hussie is going to pull a conclusive ending like everyone is expecting he will. Epilogues aren't really places for that to happen, yknow? I feel like, if he really wanted the kind of conclusive ending that the rest of the fandom wants, he would've just...done it? It's not like he was low on time or didn't have the capabilities. He just...chose not to have it end that way. If that does happen, I'll be pleasantly surprised, but...on the other hand, I have this feeling that what we got is how Hussie really wanted the last note of the comic to be, with the epilogue as more of the final bow on top.
|
|
|
Post by swampmist on Apr 21, 2016 0:49:36 GMT
For anybody else I wouldn't think this, but Hussie knows how to do this and has done it before. Everything that felt wrong about Collide and Act 7 just felt too... deliberate for him not to be pulling something on us now. Hahaha what do you meeean it was totally normal. *ends Collide in the most bizarrely ominous way imaginable* *takes an hour to append his newspost with the information that was most pertinent to us, when there's no way he forgot* *refers to the ending as "THIS ending" instead of "THE ending", multiple times* Haha oh wait. ... I was 30% sure it was a troll before reading this. Now I'm 70%.
|
|
|
Post by alleywaycreeper on Apr 21, 2016 1:11:25 GMT
I feel like, if he really wanted the kind of conclusive ending that the rest of the fandom wants, he would've just...done it? It's not like he was low on time or didn't have the capabilities. He just...chose not to have it end that way. I will defer to Spade's Slick on this one: This is kind of what Hussie does. He adds things when he doesn't have to and takes fifty pages to explain what he could've gotten across in two. Whether or not it's a good idea, it's an in-character thing for Hussie to pull. And it's like I said...if there is an ending where this happy ending is torn to shreds, it hits us harder than if he just went with the 'real' ending first, and it illustrates the Mario star thing Hussie was blabbering on about way back after the Trickster arc.
|
|